Analisis Hukum terhadap Pelaku Kekerasan Seksual yang Dilakukan Anak Sebagai Pelaku terhadap Anak sebagai Korban (Studi Putusan Nomor: 18/Pid.Sus-Anak/2020/Pn. Sbs.)

Authors

  • Dandy Leonardus Tarigan PUI PT Business Law E-commerce, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Prima Indonesia, Medan, Sumatera Utara, 20112, Indonesia
  • Venia Utami Keliat PUI PT Business Law E-commerce, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Prima Indonesia, Medan, Sumatera Utara, 20112, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59011/vjlaws.5.2.2026.363-373

Keywords:

Child Sexual Violence, Child Victim, Rule of Law

Abstract

Sexual violence involving children as both perpetrators and victims presents a complex legal issue because it requires balancing victim protection with the rehabilitation of child offenders. This study aims to examine the legal regulation of sanctions for sexual violence under Indonesian child protection law and to analyze the judicial reasoning in Decision Number 18/Pid.Sus-Anak/2020/PN.Sbs. The research employs a normative legal method using statutory and case approaches. Primary legal materials consist of legislation on child protection, the juvenile criminal justice system, the Criminal Code, and the selected court decision, supported by secondary and tertiary legal materials. Data were analyzed qualitatively through legal interpretation and deductive legal reasoning. The findings indicate that Indonesian law distinguishes sanctions for adult and juvenile offenders. Adult perpetrators are subject to imprisonment of five to fifteen years and fines of up to IDR 5 billion under the Child Protection Law. In contrast, juvenile offenders are sentenced under the Juvenile Criminal Justice System, which emphasizes restorative justice, rehabilitation, diversion, and reduced sentencing. In Decision Number 18/Pid.Sus-Anak/2020/PN.Sbs, the court found that all elements of the offense had been proven and imposed a sentence of ten months’ imprisonment and six months of vocational training after considering the offender’s age, the psychological impact on the victim, and the principles of justice, legal certainty, and child protection. The study concludes that judicial decisions involving juvenile sexual offenders should maintain a balance between accountability, victim protection, and the best interests of the child.

References

Gultom, Maidin. 2017. Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Anak dan Perempuan. Cetakan III. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.

Heriyanti, Kartina Pakpahan, Dela Septiana Pinayungan, Lilis Suriani Pane, dan Gracesela Sondang Sormin. 2023. “Upaya Penanggulangan Kekerasan Seksual terhadap Anak di SD Kota Medan.” Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum 4 (2): 300–307. https://doi.org/10.55637/juinhum.4.2.7597.300-307.

Kabnani, Frans A., Karolus Kopong Medan, dan Rudepel Petrus Leo. 2025. “Dasar Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Menjatuhkan Pidana terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Persetubuhan Anak atas Kesepakatan Bersama dalam Perspektif Keadilan.” Journal of Administrative and Social Science 6 (1): 120–132. https://doi.org/10.55606/jass.v6i1.2098.

Kettrey, Heather Hensman, dan Noah Samuel Reynolds. 2026. “Is Restorative Justice Appropriate for Sexual Assault and Domestic Violence? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the ‘Empirical Vacuum.’” Journal of Experimental Criminology 22: 229–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-024-09651-8.

Kimbrell, Catherine S., David B. Wilson, dan Ajima Olaghere. 2023. “Restorative Justice Programs and Practices in Juvenile Justice: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis for Effectiveness.” Criminology & Public Policy 22 (1): 161–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12613.

Lussier, Patrick, Evan McCuish, Stéphanie Chouinard Thivierge, dan Julien Frechette. 2024. “A Meta-Analysis of Trends in General, Sexual, and Violent Recidivism among Youth with Histories of Sex Offending.” Trauma, Violence, & Abuse 25 (1): 54–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380221137653.

Maskur, Apriyanti. 2025. “Juridical Analysis of the Judgment of Acquittal from All Lawsuits for Perpetrators of Defamation Through Social Media.” Journal of Legal Contemplation 1 (1): 46–59. https://doi.org/10.63288/jlc.v1i1.5.

Munawir, M., Muhammad Kurniawan Budi Wibowo, dan Baehaqi. 2024. “Penafsiran Pemberian Dispensasi Perkawinan di Bawah Umur di Pengadilan Agama Kabupaten Sukoharjo Tahun 2019–2021.” AL HUKMU: Journal of Islamic Law and Economics 3 (1): 53–63. https://doi.org/10.54090/hukmu.318.

Mulyadi, Lilik. 2014. Wajah Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak Indonesia. Bandung: PT Alumni.

Nurhayati, dan Juwita. 2025. “Analisis Yuridis Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual terhadap Anak (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 832/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Jkt.Brt).” IBLAM Law Review 5 (1): 47–55. https://doi.org/10.52249/ilr.v5i1.527.

Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Sambas Nomor 18/Pid.Sus-Anak/2020/PN.SBS.

Rumble, Lauren, Ryan Fajar Febrianto, Melania Niken Larasati, Carolyn Hamilton, Ben Mathews, dan Michael P. Dunne. 2020. “Childhood Sexual Violence in Indonesia: A Systematic Review.” Trauma, Violence, & Abuse 21 (2): 284–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838018767932.

Santoso, Niko Edi, dan Itok Dwi Kurniawan. 2023. “Pertimbangan Hakim Menjatuhkan Pidana Tindak Pidana Persetubuhan kepada Anak (Studi Putusan Nomor 3/Pid.Sus-Anak/2022/PN Wng).” Verstek 11 (2): 231–240. https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v11i2.71513.

Silvennoinen, Elisa, dan Tarja Koskela. 2023. “Is Special Treatment of a Minor Offender against the Best Interests of the Minor Victim?” Nordisk Tidsskrift for Kriminalvidenskab 110 (3): 259–274. https://doi.org/10.7146/ntfk.v110i3.141462.

Simanjuntak, Immanuel, Angelica Florencia C. Zega, Daniel Gidion Tambunan, Aisyah, dan Azwir Agus. 2023. “Kajian Yuridis terhadap Anak sebagai Pelaku pada Kasus Persetubuhan Anak di Bawah Umur (Studi Putusan Nomor 2/Pid.Sus-Anak/2021/PN Prn).” Jurnal Rectum: Tinjauan Yuridis Penanganan Tindak Pidana 5 (2): 164–174. https://doi.org/10.46930/jurnalrectum.v5i2.3500.

Simanjuntak, Immanuel, dan Mernan Sinaga. 2022. “Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap Anak sebagai Korban Pelecehan Seksual (Studi Putusan No. 64/Pid.Sus/2021/PN Mdn).” Supremasi Jurnal Hukum 5 (1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.36441/supremasi.v5i1.853.

Siregar, Kurniati. 2021. “Pelaksanaan Pengawasan dan Pengamatan terhadap Pola Pembinaan Anak oleh Hakim Pengawas dan Pengamat Pengadilan Negeri Medan.” Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP) 4 (1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.34012/jihap.v4i1.2059.

Soekanto, Soerjono, dan Sri Mamudji. 2015. Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Edisi ke-1, Cetakan ke-17. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Surbakti, Anton Diary Steward, Eko Prasetia Purba, dan Opri Sembiring Maha. 2022. “Kajian Yuridis Tindak Pencurian dengan Kekerasan pada Anak di Bawah Umur di Pengadilan Negeri Medan (Studi Putusan Nomor 80/Pid.Sus-Anak/2017/PN Mdn).” Jurnal Rectum: Tinjauan Yuridis Penanganan Tindak Pidana 4 (2). https://doi.org/10.46930/jurnalrectum.v4i2.1747.

Suryani, Dewi Ervina, Ablisar Madiasa, Marlina, dan Jelly Leviza. 2015. “Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Anak Korban Eksploitasi Seksual dalam Pernikahan Dini (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Indonesia Nomor 690K/PID.SUS/2010).” USU Law Journal 3 (2): 179–191.

Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak.

Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2016 tentang Penetapan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak.

Yusyanti, Diana. 2020. “Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Anak Korban dari Pelaku Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 20 (4): 619–636. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2020.V20.619-636.

Zulkifli, Suhaila, Yanti Agustina, Atika Sunarto, Iin Hotprinauli Purba, dan Muhammad Ali Adnan. 2022. “Penyuluhan tentang Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Anak di Bawah Umur.” Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Tjut Nyak Dhien 1 (2): 7–13. https://doi.org/10.36490/jpmtnd.v1i2.267.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-30

How to Cite

Analisis Hukum terhadap Pelaku Kekerasan Seksual yang Dilakukan Anak Sebagai Pelaku terhadap Anak sebagai Korban (Studi Putusan Nomor: 18/Pid.Sus-Anak/2020/Pn. Sbs.). (2026). Verdict: Journal of Law Science, 5(2), 363-373. https://doi.org/10.59011/vjlaws.5.2.2026.363-373

Similar Articles

1-10 of 73

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.