Analisis Yuridis Perbuatan Penipuan dengan Modus Giveaway dalam Perspektif Undang-Undang ITE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59011/vjlaws.5.1.2026.223-233Keywords:
Fraud, Giveaway, Social media, Criminal code, ITE lawAbstract
This study evaluates deceptive practices involving the giveaway scheme through the lens of the ITE Law. The investigation primarily centers its attention upon regulations that have not explicitly mentioned fraudulent acts using the giveaway method in legislation, thus giving rise to conflicting norms between laws. This study focuses on analyzing: how is the legal regulation of fraudulent acts using the giveaway method in Indonesia and how is the law enforced against perpetrators of fraud using the giveaway method. This inquiry employs a normative legal research design, integrating legislative, theoretical, and judicial precedent perspectives. The results indicate that although Indonesian legislation does not explicitly regulate giveaway fraud as a distinct criminal offense, such conduct can nevertheless be prosecuted under the existing legal framework. The fraudulent giveaway schemes currently fall under the jurisdiction of Article 492 of the Criminal Code (lex generalis) and Article 28 subsection (1) of the ITE Law (lex specialis). Perpetrators of fraud will be punished in accordance with the applicable legal basis in order to pay attention to the application of the principle of lex specialis derogat legi generali as a basis for determining norms to realize legal certainty and provide protection to victims of technology-based fraud. The findings provide guidance for law enforcement agencies, including investigators, prosecutors, and judges, in determining the appropriate legal basis for prosecuting giveaway fraud conducted through electronic media. The recognition of electronic information and electronic documents as valid evidence further strengthens the effectiveness of criminal investigations and prosecutions in cybercrime cases.
References
Arifiyadi, Teguh. Cybercrime: Tindak Pidana di Dunia Maya. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2018.
Christianto, Hwian. “Pembaharuan Makna Asas Legalitas.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan 39, no. 3 (2017): 348–75. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol39.no3.1512.
Cintiya, Ida Ayu Parami, Ni Putu Rai Yuliartini, and Dewa Gede Sudika Mangku. “Modus Penipuan Berkedok Giveaway Di Era Digital: Cara Mengenali Dan Menghindarinya.” Perspektif Administrasi Publik Dan Hukum 3, no. 1 (2026): 31–45. https://doi.org/10.62383/perspektif.v3i1.909.
Denisya, Ni Putu, I Nyoman Putu Budiartha, and I Made Aditya Mantara Putra. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Data Pribadi Nasabah Oleh Bank Dalam Transaksi Melalui Internet Banking.” Jurnal Preferensi Hukum 5, no. 2 (2024): 246–52. https://doi.org/10.22225/jph.5.2.8088.246-252.
Diansah, Hendri, S Usman, and Yulia Monita. “Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Tindak Pidana Carding.” PAMPAS: Journal Of Criminal 3, no. 1 (2022): 15–30. https://doi.org/10.22437/pampas.v3i1.17704.
Diantha, I Made Pasek. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dalam Justifikasi Teori Hukum. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group, 2017.
Dwistia, Halen, Meilisa Sajdah, Octa Awaliah, and Nisa Elfina. “Pemanfaatan Media Sosial Sebagai Media Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam.” Ar-Rusyd: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam 1, no. 2 (2022): 81–99. https://doi.org/10.61094/arrusyd.2830-2281.33.
Fujianti, Indah. “Pemanfaatan Media Sosial Sebagai Media Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam.” Action Research Journal Indonesia (ARJI) 7, no. 1 (2025): 275–85. https://doi.org/10.61227/arji.v7i1.270.
Hamzah, Andi. KUHP Dan KUHAP. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2014.
Hasibuan, Nahda, Budi Sastra Panjaitan, and Annisa Sativa. “Tinjauan Yuridis Pelepasan Terdakwa Dari Segala Tuntutan Hukum Dalam Kasus Tindak Pidana Penipuan Menurut Perspedktif Hukum Positif Dan Hukum Islam:Analisis Yuridis Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Medan Nomor: 1772/Pid.B/2021/PN.Mdn.” As-Syar i Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga 5, no. 3 (2024): 665–80. https://doi.org/10.47467/as.v5i3.3403.
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 76.
Lokas, Richard. “Barang Bukti Dan Alat Bukti Dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana.” Lex et Societatis 3, no. 9 (2015): 124–29. https://doi.org/10.35796/les.v3i9.10177.
Lubis, Muhammad Dwi Fahri, and Hj. Mahzaniar. “Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Tindak Pidana Penipuan Give Away Melalui Media Sosial di Kota Tanjungbalai.” Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum 3, no. 3 (2025): 2308–15. https://doi.org/10.61104/alz.v3i3.1622.
Moeljatno. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Edisi Revi. Jakarta: Penerbit Rineka, 2008.
Mustikajati, Aina Aurora, and Sulistyanta Sulistyanta. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penipuan Online Berdasarkan Perspektif KUHP Dan Undang-Undang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik.” Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik Dan Humaniora 1, no. 2 (2024): 156–169. https://doi.org/10.62383/progres.v1i2.256.
Prayoga, Daffa Arya, Jadmiko Anom Husodo, and Andina Elok Puri Maharani. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hak Warga Negara Dengan Berlakunya Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2019 Tentang Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Nasional.” Souvereignty: Jurnal Demokrasi Dan Ketahanan Nasiona 2, no. 2 (2023): 188–200.
Purbacaraka, Purnadi, and Soerjono Soekanto. Perundang-Undangan Dan Yurisprudensi. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 1993.
Puspitasari, Ikka. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penipuan Online Dalam Hukum Positif Di Indonesia.” HUMANI (Hukum Dan Masyarakat Madani) 8, no. 1 (2018): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.26623/humani.v8i1.1383.
Putri, Nisa Nindia, Sahuri Lasmadi, and Erwin Erwin. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Perusahaan Pers Terhadap Pemberitaan Yang Mencemarkan Nama Baik Orang Lain Melalui Media Cetak Online.” PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law 2, no. 2 (2021): 123–39. https://doi.org/10.22437/pampas.v2i2.14761.
Rahmad, Noor. “Kajian Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Penipuan Secara Online.” Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah 3, no. 2 (2019): 103–17. https://doi.org/10.26618/j-hes.v3i2.2419.
Rahmawati, Tiara, H. Agus Takariawan, and Rully Herdita Ramadhani. “Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Penipuan Berbasis Online Dengan Modus Giveaway Di Platform Media Sosial.” Paulus Law Journal 3, no. 2 (2022): 102–18. https://doi.org/10.51342/plj.v3i2.363.
Rudzki, Romuald E.J., and Shaomei Li. “The Economic Paradox of the ‘Freebies’ Phenomena: How and Why Companies Give Stuff Away for Free.” Direct Marketing: An International Journal 1, no. 4 (2007): 180–194. https://doi.org/10.1108/17505930710836960.
Saleh, Roeslan. Beberapa Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana Dalam Perspektif. Jakarta: Aksara Baru, 1981.
Samudra, Anton Hendrik. “Modus Operandi Dan Problematika Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Penipuan Daring.” Mimbar Hukum 31, no. 1 (2019): 59–74. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.34786.
Situngkir, Danel Aditia. “Asas Legalitas Dalam Hukum Pidana Nasional Dan Hukum Pidana Internasional.” Soumatera Law Review 1, no. 1 (2018): 22–42. https://doi.org/10.22216/soumlaw.v1i1.3398.
Soekanto, Soerjono, and Sri Mamudji. Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. 18th ed. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2018.
Strašek, Nejc. “Internet Kot Orodje Razvoja Sodobne Družbe.” Mednarodno Inovativno Poslovanje 16, no. 2 (2024): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.32015/jibm.2024.16.2.9.
Sugandhi, R. Hukum Pidana I. Semarang: Yayasan Sudarto, 1983.
Sunarso, Siswanto. Hukum Informasi dan Telekomunikasi Internet: Studi Kasus Prita Mulyasari. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2009.
Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 6842.
Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 6905
Wahid, Abdul dan Labib, Mohammad. Kejahatan Mayantara (Cyber Crime): Suatu Pengantar. Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2010.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nyoman Candradevi Triantini, I Nyoman Sujana, I Made Aditya Mantara Putra
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
