Analisis Hukum atas Putusan Hakim Terhadap Wanprestasi dalam Perjanjian Utang Piutang (Studi Putusan Nomor 1095/Pdt.G/2024/PN Mdn)

Authors

  • Ayu Mentari Sinambela PUI PT Business Law E-commerce, Sarjana Hukum, Universitas Prima Indonesia, Medan, Sumatera Utara, 20112, Indonesia
  • Iin Hot Prinauli Purba PUI PT Business Law E-commerce, Sarjana Hukum, Universitas Prima Indonesia, Medan, Sumatera Utara, 20112, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59011/vjlaws.5.1.2026.66-81

Keywords:

Judge’s decision, Default, Debt agreement, Legal analysis, Contract debts

Abstract

This study aims to investigate a breach of contract in a case illustrated by the studied decision. The Medan District Court Decision Number 1095/Pdt.G/2024/PN Mdn serves as a compelling case for legal analysis in civil law. The panel of judges deliberated on the legal facts in their ruling. The judge’s legal considerations are crucial as they demonstrate the application of civil law to the specific facts in contention. This study seeks to identify and analyze the facts of the case and the legal facts underpinning the examination of the Medan District Court Decision Number 1095/Pdt.G/2024/PN Mdn, as well as to evaluate the judge’s legal reasoning in rendering a verdict on the civil matter. This study employs a normative legal research method. The findings suggest that the Defendant’s actions, which resulted in losses for the Plaintiffs, may be legally classified as a breach of contract or breach of promise, as they evidently contravene the stipulations of Article 1243 of the Civil Code. This provision mandates that the duty to indemnify for expenses, damages, and interest arises if the debtor, although being deemed negligent, fails to fulfill his duties or fulfills them after the designated timeframe has elapsed. The judge determined that the Defendant’s actions constituted a violation of the agreement, resulting in a breach of contract or breach of promise. This decision exemplifies the appropriate application of civil law regarding evidence, the enforcement of legal norms, and the evaluation of the facts presented in court.

References

Aliyah, Himmatul. “Tanggung Jawab Hukum Dalam Perjanjian Peminjaman.” Jurnal Sains Student Research 1, no. 1 (2023): 869–76. https://doi.org/10.61722/jssr.v1i1.407.

Aziz, Abdul, and Ramdansyah. “Esensi Utang Dalam Konsep Ekonomi Islam.” Bisnis: Jurnal Bisnis Dan Manajemen Islam 4, no. 1 (2016): 124–35. https://doi.org/10.21043/bisnis.v4i1.1689.

Buhang, Shyandra Putri, Fence M Wantu, and Nuvazria Achir. “Kewenangan Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Putusan Perkara Pembunuhan Sesuai Undang-Undang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.” Jembatan Hukum: Kajian Ilmu Hukum, Sosial Dan Administrasi Negara 1, no. 2 (2024): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.62383/jembatan.v1i2.119.

Fajriyanti, F, I Haryanto, and R Pebrianto. “Analisis Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Sumbawa Besar Terhadap Penyelesaian Sengketa Wanprestasi Di Kabupaten Sumbawa (Studi Kasus Putusan No.42/Pdt.G/2019/Pn.Sbw).” Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research 4, no. 4 (2024): 6635–6647. https://doi.org/10.31004/innovative.v4i4.13770.

Halim, Yoefanca, and Hardy Salim. “Keabsahan Putusan Pengadilan Yang Belum Inkracht Sebagai Novum Dalam Pengajuan Peninjauan Kembali.” Jurnal Suara Hukum 2, no. 1 (2020): 89–107. https://doi.org/10.26740/jsh.v2n1.p86-104.

Holle, Muhammad Syafri Bahtra, Sherly Adam, and Yanti Amelia Lewerissa. “Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Dalam Putusan Perkara Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan.” Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia 10, no. 4 (2025): 4193–4201. https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-literate.v10i4.58207.

Iwanti, Nur Azza Morlin, and Taun. “Akibat Hukum Wanprestasi Serta Upaya Hukum Wanprestasi Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Yang Berlaku.” The Juris 6, no. 2 (December 12, 2022): 351–61. https://doi.org/10.56301/juris.v6i2.601.

Marda, Guruh, Vito Dewangga, Rafi Ashtari Musyaffa, and Cinta Sekar Kinanti. “Pembuktian Hukum Acara Perdata Melalui Pengetahuan Hakim.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Kesejahteraan 8, no. 2 (2023): 35–49. https://doi.org/10.36722/jmih.v8i2.2306.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Kencana, 2024.

Nuralisha, M. A, and S Mahmudah. “Tinjauan Yuridis Tanggung Jawab Hukum Dalam Perjanjian Kredit Perbankan Apabila Debitur Wanprestasi.” AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial Islam 5, no. 1 (2023): 277–290. https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v5i1.2364.

Putri, Tata Nindya, Nurarafah Nurarafah, and Sofyan Jafar. “Analysis of Disputes Related to Defaults in Debt and Receivable Agreements.” Proceedings of Malikussaleh International Conference on Law, Legal Studies and Social Science (MICoLLS) 4, no. 53 (2024): 1–10.

Rahmani, Imma. “Pelaksanaan Hak Dan Kewajiban Warga Negara Indonesia Di Dalam Bidang Pendidikan Tinjauan Dari Pasal 31 Undang-Undang Dasar Tahun 1945.” Pamulang Law Review 5, no. 1 (2022): 77–84. https://doi.org/10.32493/palrev.v5i1.23611.

Ridwan, Muhammad Riandi Nur, and Yana Sukma Permana. “Wanprestasi Dan Akibatnya Dalam Pelaksanaan Perjanjian.” The Juris 6, no. 2 (December 13, 2022): 441–51. https://doi.org/10.56301/juris.v6i2.616.

S, Binsar Jon Vic, and Dewi Iryani. “Legal Settlement Of Breach Of Bank Loan Agreement With Fair Guarantees.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Prima 8, no. 2 (2025): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.34012/jihp.v8i2.7636.

Salsabila, A. N, and G Djajaputera. “Kewajiban Bagi Debitur Yang Melakukan Wanprestasi Kepada Kreditur Dalam Kasus Kredit Macet.” Ranah Research : Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development 7, no. 1 (2024): 667–76. https://doi.org/10.38035/rrj.v7i1.1300.

Santosa, Prayitno Iman. “Criminal Law Consideration (Ratio Decidendi).” Indonesian Journal of Law and Policy Studies 1, no. 2 (2020): 90–105. https://doi.org/10.31000/ijlp.v1i2.2774.

Sibarani, Clarisa Sondang, Shabiha Elena Putri, Triani Cahya Hutahaean, and Welly Gosal. “Negligence in Fulfilling Contractual Obligations.” Asian Journal of Social and Humanities 3, no. 3 (2025): 1346–58. https://doi.org/10.59888/ajosh.v3i7.541.

Yuan, Shafaa Alaadini, and Gunawan Djajaputra. “Analysis of the Judgment of the Judge in the Settlement of Default Agreement Debts (Case Study Decision Number 515/Pdt.G/2020/PN.Jkt.Sel).” Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities (JLPH) 5, no. 2 (2024): 1040–49. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i2.

Zulfikar, Riza, Novi Prisela Putri, and Hadi Purnomo. “Settlement of Defaults in Restructuring Efforts in Credit Agreements at Bank Pasar Rembang (Case Study Decision Number: 7/Pdt.G/2021/Pn.Rbg).” Jurnal Restorasi : Hukum Dan Politik 1, no. 2 (2023): 62–71.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-07

How to Cite

Analisis Hukum atas Putusan Hakim Terhadap Wanprestasi dalam Perjanjian Utang Piutang (Studi Putusan Nomor 1095/Pdt.G/2024/PN Mdn). (2026). Verdict: Journal of Law Science, 5(1), 66-81. https://doi.org/10.59011/vjlaws.5.1.2026.66-81

Similar Articles

1-10 of 41

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.