Manipulative Language and Power in Intimate Relationships: A Forensic Linguistic Analysis of Victim Testimony Narratives in ‘Luka dan Saksi’ (Chapter 21) of Broken Strings by Aurélie Moeremans
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59011/austronesian.5.1.2026.29-43Keywords:
Forensic linguistics, Manipulative language, Intimate Partner Violence, Victim testimony, Critical Discourse AnalysisAbstract
Research on intimate partner violence has shown that abuse is not only physical but also constructed through language; however, previous studies have largely focused on institutional discourse and have not systematically examined manipulative language in literary victim testimony. This study aims to analyze the linguistic strategies of manipulation and control in perpetrator discourse as reconstructed in the victim’s narrative in Chapter 21 (“Luka dan Saksi”) of Broken Strings (2023) by Aurélie Moeremans, and to examine how these strategies construct power asymmetry. This study adopts a qualitative approach integrating critical discourse analysis and forensic linguistics, focusing on micro linguistic features and macro social meanings. The data consist of 23 perpetrator utterances analyzed through a thematic and interpretive framework. The results reveal six recurrent patterns of manipulative strategies, namely threats and coercion, interrogative control, suicidal threats, gaslighting, victim blaming discourse, and emotional manipulation. These patterns demonstrate an observable escalation from implicit intimidation to more explicit forms of coercion. The findings show that linguistic features function to construct manipulation and sustain unequal power relations within intimate relationships. The study concludes that manipulative language operates as a form of discursive violence that reinforces coercive control. This research contributes to forensic linguistics by highlighting literary testimony as a valuable data source and by offering an integrative approach to analyzing manipulative discourse in non institutional contexts.
References
Andrus, J. (2024). “My word against his”: Micro and macro analysis of stories about violence in intimate partner relationships. Language & Communication, 98, 74–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2024.07.002
Andrus, J. (2025). Emergent intertextual networks: Intertextuality in storytelling about intimate partner violence and the revisioning of social norms. Discourse & Society, 36(6), 844-862. https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265251332619
Bourdieu, P. (1993). Language and symbolic power. Harvard University Press.
Burgoon, J.K. and Buller, D.B. (2015). Interpersonal Deception Theory. In The International Encyclopedia of Interpersonal Communication (eds C.R. Berger, M.E. Roloff, S.R. Wilson, J.P. Dillard, J. Caughlin and D. Solomon). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118540190.wbeic170
Campbell, J. C., Webster, D., Koziol-McLain, J., Block, C., Campbell, D., Curry, M. A., Gary, F., Glass, N., McFarlane, J., Sachs, C., Sharps, P., Ulrich, Y., Wilt, S. A., Manganello, J., Xu, X., Schollenberger, J., Frye, V., & Laughon, K. (2003). Risk factors for femicide in abusive relationships: results from a multisite case control study. American journal of public health, 93(7), 1089–1097. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.93.7.1089
Coates, L., & Wade, A. (2007). Langauge and violence: Analysis of four discursive operations. Journal of Family Violence, 22(7), 511–522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-007-9082-2
Coulthard, M., Johnson, A., & Wright, D. (2016). An Introduction to Forensic Linguistics: Language in Evidence (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315630311
De Fina, A., & Georgakopoulou, A. (2012). Analyzing narrative: Discourse and sociolinguistic perspectives. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139051255
Dutton, D. G., & Painter, S. (1981). Traumatic bonding: The development of emotional attachments in battered women. Victimology, 6(1–4), 139–155.
Ehrlich, S. (2001). Representing Rape: Language and sexual consent (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203459034
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman.
Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315834368
Felman, S., & Laub, D. (1992). Testimony: Crises of Witnessing in Literature, Psychoanalysis and History (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203700327
Fraser, B. (1990). Perspectives on politeness. Journal of Pragmatics, 14(2), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90081-N
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). Edward Arnold.
Heita, R.M. (2024). A forensic linguistics investigation of threat text messages addressed to gender-based violence (GBV) Victims Reported to the Namibian Police Force, Windhoek. Namibia University of Science and Technology, Department of Communication and Languages. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.17403.43040
Herman, D. (2009). Basic elements of narrative. Wiley-Blackwell.
Kilgore, C. D., Cronley, C., & Lehmann, P. (2015). Social Construction of Intimate Partner Violence: A Brief Report on Quantitative Grammatical Analysis. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 24(10), 1123–1133. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2015.1074136
Langan, D., Hannem, S., & Stewart, C. (2016). Deconstructing accounts of intimate partner violence: Doing Interviews, Identities, and Neoliberalism. Applied Linguistics, 37(2), 219–239. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu019
Lazar, M. M. (2007). Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis: Articulating a Feminist Discourse Praxis1. Critical Discourse Studies, 4(2), 141–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900701464816
Matoesian, G. M. (2001). Law and the language of identity: Discourse in the William Kennedy Smith Rape Trial. Oxford University Press.
McCornack, S. A., Morrison, K., Paik, J. E., Wisner, A. M., & Zhu, X. (2014). Information manipulation theory 2: A propositional theory of deceptive discourse production. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33(4), 348–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X14534656
Moeremans, A. (2026). Broken strings. Ohara Books
Neubauer, L., Straw, I., Mariconti, E., et al. (2023). A systematic literature review of the use of computational text analysis methods in intimate partner violence research. Journal of Family Violence, 38, 1205–1224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-023-00517-7
Riessman, C. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. Sage Publications, Inc.
Shuy, R. W. (2008). The language of confession, interrogation, and deception. Sage.
Stark, E. (2007). Coercive control: How men entrap women in personal life. Oxford University Press.
Talbot, M. (2010). Language and gender (2nd ed.). Polity Press.
Trinch, S. (2003). Latinas’ Narratives of Domestic Abuse: Discrepant versions of violence. John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.17
van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and power. Palgrave Macmillan.
Walker, L. E. (1979). The battered woman. Harper & Row.
Wodak, R. (1997). Gender and discourse. Sage Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446250204
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Niken Ardila Rehiraky
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
