Traditional Speech of Pamale (Engagement Ceremony) of Loura Culture, Southwest Sumba: An Ethnography of Speaking
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59011/austronesian.5.3.2026.918-929Keywords:
Ethnography of Communication, Pamale, Loura Culture, Semantic Parallelism, BelisAbstract
This research aims to describe and analyze the forms, social functions, and cultural meanings of traditional speech in the Pamale engagement ceremony of the Loura people in Southwest Sumba. Employing a qualitative approach with the ethnography of communication method, this study examines ritual communication practices through Dell Hymes’ SPEAKING model. Data were collected through participant observation, in-depth interviews with Ata Panewe (traditional spokespersons), and audio-visual documentation. The findings reveal that Pamale traditional speech is dominated by semantic parallelism (ritual parallelism), utilizing standardized word pairs as a manifestation of the Loura cosmology. Functionally, this speech acts as a performative speech act that legitimizes the customary legal status of the couple and serves as an instrument for conflict mitigation through the use of euphemisms during Belis (bride price) negotiations. The cultural meaning within this speech represents a total social fact that transforms material economic value into symbolic honor for the clan (Kabizu). The study concludes that Pamale traditional speech is not merely an oral tradition but a legal instrument and a guardian of social harmony that binds the Loura community amidst the currents of modernization.
References
Anshori, M. A., Malik, A., & Fakhri, M. (2026). Ethnography of communication in the Besentulak tradition: A SPEAKING model analysis of the dynamics of cultural communication among the Sasak community in Jerowaru Village. International Journal of Sociology of Religion, 4(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.70687/k3hfbp46
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.
Djoh, D. A., Pati, D. U., & Taranau, O. K. (2023). Ritual petani Marapu (Makna simbolik ritual petani Marapu di Desa Wunga Kabupaten Sumba Timur). Jurnal Pendidikan dan Konseling, 5(1), 3926–3934. https://doi.org/10.31004/jpdk.v5i1.11642
Fishman, J. A. (1991). Reversing language shift: Theoretical and empirical foundations of assistance to threatened languages. Multilingual Matters.
Fox, J. J. (1971). Semantic parallelism in Rotinese ritual language. Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde, 127(2), 215–255. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134379-90002782
Fox, J. J. (Ed.). (1988). To speak in pairs: Essays on the ritual languages of eastern Indonesia. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511551369
Hakim, M. N., Hidayat, W., & Jusrianto, J. (2025). Language, identity, and survival: An ethnographic study on the revitalization of the Limola language in South Sulawesi. Frontiers in Sociology, 10, Article 1686828. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2025.1686828
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. Edward Arnold.
House, J., Kádár, D. Z., Liu, F., Liu, S., Shi, W., Xia, Z., & Jiao, L. (2021). Interaction, speech acts and ritual: An integrative model. Lingua, 257, Article 103082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2021.103082
Hymes, D. (1972). Models of the interaction of language and social life. In J. J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (pp. 35–71). Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Izahaslina, N., & Ridwan, M. H. (2026). Ritual language in Osing cultural ceremonies: A sociolinguistic study of speech genre in Seblang ritual in Olehsari. Jurnal Sastra Indonesia, 15(1), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.15294/jsi.v15i1.41311
Jakobson, R. (1960). Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In T. A. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in language (pp. 350–377). MIT Press.
Keban, B. S. S., Bin Toni, E. A., & Djonda, U. (2026). Parallelism in Solor-Lamaholot wedding ritual speech. Journal of English Language and Education, 11(5), 1195–1203. https://doi.org/10.31004/jele.v11i5.3111
Kamuri, P. A., & Mone, Y. R. (2024). Conceptualisation of Sumba people in interpreting Nukku Zara in ritual speech of Pangadi Nga’a Pabenudi We’e Marapu. Academic Journal of Educational Sciences, 8(2), 36–43. https://doi.org/10.35508/ajes.v8i2.19475
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
Manafe, Y. D., Wutun, M., & Aslam, M. (2026). Membaca pesan transendental melalui komunikasi ritual Wiaha Manu. Jurnal Komunikasi Universitas Garut: Hasil Pemikiran dan Penelitian, 12(1), 430–451. https://doi.org/10.52434/jk.v12i1.43585
Meighan, P. J. (2024). Indigenous language revitalization using TEK-nology: How can traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) and technology support intergenerational language transmission? Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 45(8), 3059–3077. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2022.2084548
Cordia, G. M., Sutajaya, I. M., Suja, I. W., & Astawa, I. B. M. (2024). Harmonization of Parahyangan, Pawongan, and Pabelasan in the Pamalle ritual: A study of the local wisdom of the Sumbanese community. International Journal of Educational and Life Sciences, 2(11), 1245–1258. https://doi.org/10.59890/ijels.v2i11.2690
Muliani, M., & Ate, C. P. (2026). The lexicogrammar of customary law: A transitivity analysis of Sasak ritual discourse in wedding ceremonies. ELite Journal: International Journal of Education, Language and Literature, 6(2), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.26740/elitejournal.v6n2.p11-22
Patiung, N., Sitoto, S., Marewa, Y., & Waangsir, A. (2026). Struktur dan makna simbol dalam prosesi Rampanan Kapa’: Perspektif semiotika dan antropolinguistik. Ranah: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.26499/rnh.v15i1.8533
Purba, A. R., Situmorang, R. T. R., Siregar, A. J., & Tifany. (2025). Language variation in traditional ceremony of the Batak Toba: A sociolinguistic analysis. Jurnal Pembelajaran Bahasa dan Sastra, 4(6), 1535–1546. https://doi.org/10.55909/jpbs.v4i6.976
Rattu, J., Kaunang, I., Piri, E., & Zulfa, Z. (2025). The linguistic vitality of Tatambaken: The dynamics of managing oral traditions as the living heritage of the Minahasa community. Ranah: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, 14(2), 762–771. https://doi.org/10.26499/rnh.v14i2.7023
Sarjono, S., Kadri, M., & Fakhri, M. (2023). The sacredness of communication in the Ngasuh Gumi tradition of the North Lombok: An ethnographic analysis. KOMUNIKE: Jurnal Komunikasi Penyiaran Islam, 15(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.20414/jurkom.v15i1.7033
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438
Syahputra, A. (2026). Riau Malay cultural communication: An ethnography of communication on Basiacuang practices. Kutubkhanah: Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan, 26(1), 30–46. https://doi.org/10.24014/kutubkhanah.v26i1.39715
Tuti, S. N., & Safitri, R. (2024). The ritual communication as a medium for cultural preservation and collective identity: Study on Nyadran Sonoageng tradition. SANGKéP: Jurnal Kajian Sosial Keagamaan, 7(3), 537–554. https://doi.org/10.20414/sangkep.v7i3.11820
Wungubelen, M. M. A., Murtiningsih, B. S. E., & Susilo, D. (2024). Communication ethnography in the royal funeral ritual in the Marapu community, East Sumba. Mediator: Jurnal Komunikasi, 17(1), 95–111. https://doi.org/10.29313/mediator.v17i1.2895
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Oktaviana M. Kodi, Oce Antipas Langkameng, Yanrini Martha Anabokay
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
