A Psycholinguistic Study on the Influence of Verbal Communication Dynamics of Employees at Bali Business School

Authors

  • Epos Sister Krismon Selan Dakhi Applied Linguistics Doctoral Program, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Jakarta Timur, DKI Jakarta 13220, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59011/austronesian.5.1.2026.16-28

Keywords:

Verbal communication, Psycholinguistics, Communication dynamics, Employee communication

Abstract

This study examines the dynamics of verbal communication among employees at Bali Business School (BBS) from a psycholinguistic perspective. It aims to identify the factors influencing communication processes, particularly in relation to information delivery and feedback reception, and to analyze how these dynamics affect the effectiveness of workplace interactions. The study adopts a qualitative case study design involving purposively selected participants from various organizational roles. Data were collected through participant observation, in-depth interviews, and analysis of recorded interactions to ensure triangulation and contextual depth. The findings indicate that verbal communication dynamics are influenced by a combination of psychological, sociocultural, and situational factors, including mood, emotional control, perception, cultural background, work pressure, and individual communication styles. These factors shape how messages are constructed, conveyed, and interpreted in workplace interactions. The study also finds that communication effectiveness depends on employees’ ability to adapt their communication strategies, interpret contextual cues, and regulate emotions during interaction. However, communication barriers remain evident, particularly due to differences in perception and communication styles, especially in multicultural contexts. Reflective communication strategies, emotional regulation, and intercultural awareness are identified as key elements in enhancing interaction effectiveness and maintaining professional relationships. This study contributes by integrating psycholinguistic perspectives into workplace communication research and provides practical implications for developing communication training programs in training and human resource development settings.

References

Amalia, N. R., Karuppaiah, S., Hassan, Z., & Patak, A. A. (2023). The impact of interpersonal communication on employee performance during work from home. International Journal of Humanities and Innovation (IJHI), 6(1), 15–19. https://doi.org/10.33750/ijhi.v6i1.172

Bellmann, L., & Hübler, O. (2021). Personality traits, working conditions and health: An empirical analysis based on the German Linked Personnel Panel, 2013–2017. Review of Managerial Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-020-00426-9

Bordignon, F., & Maisonobe, M. (2022). Researchers and their data: A study based on the use of the word data in scholarly articles. Quantitative Science Studies. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00220

Feng, T., & Narayanan, S. (2022). Exploring workplace behaviors through speaking patterns using large-scale multimodal wearable recordings: A study of healthcare providers. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2212.09090

Ferguson, C. J. (2016). An effect size primer: A guide for clinicians and researchers. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 47(2), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1037/pro0000086

Gehrau, V., Lührmann, J., Stehle, H., & Röttger, U. (2024). The impact of internal communication on individual empowerment: Findings of a representative employee survey in Germany. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 18(3), 208–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2024.2312859

Ghaleb, M. M. S., & Alawad, W. A. (2025). Impact of customer communication willingness and employee oral communication on language skills development: Moderated by brand relationship quality and customer retention. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(1), 260–274. https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.11122

Heath, C. (1984). Participation in the medical consultation: The co-ordination of verbal and nonverbal behaviour between the doctor and patient. Sociology of Health and Illness. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.EP10491964

Herlin, H., & The, L. (2025). The influence of organizational culture, training, and interpersonal communication on employee work productivity. PEARL, 1(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.31253/pearl.v1i1.3974

Iddrisu, I., & Mohammed, B. (2024). Investigating the influence of employee voice on public sector performance: The mediating dynamics of organizational trust and culture. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 10, 101096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101096

Ilavarasi, I. (2024). Enhancing workplace productivity: A review of effective communication techniques and their role in fostering team collaboration and conflict resolution. International Journal for Multidimensional Research Perspectives, 2(4), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.61877/ijmrp.v2i4.132

Kamisznikow, A. (2000). Psycholinguistic implications of non-verbal behaviour: The case of face-to-face interaction. Scripta Neophilologica Posnaniensia, 2, 65–94.

Koessler, A.-K., Ortiz-Riomalo, J. F., Janke, M., & Engel, S. (2021). Structuring communication effectively: The causal effects of communication elements on cooperation in social dilemmas. Environmental and Resource Economics, 79(4), 683–712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-021-00552-2

Lusianawati, H. (2025). The role of interpersonal communication in improving work effectiveness in an organizational environment. Journal of Dialogos, 2(4), 40–51. https://doi.org/10.62872/1kxjx381

Průcha, J. (1973). Verbal communication in the classroom: A case for applied psycholinguistics. Linguistics, 11(112), 23–40.

Qin, Y. S., & Men, L. R. (2022). Exploring the impact of internal communication on employee psychological well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic: The mediating role of employee organizational trust. International Journal of Business Communication. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294884221081838

Rahmat, N. H., Razali, N. A. A., & Awang, N. H. (2019). An investigation of the influence of communication at the operational and individual level at the workplace. European Journal of Social Sciences Studies, 4(5), 102–112. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3561199

Rashid, Y., Rashid, A., Warraich, M. A., Sabir, S. S., & Waseem, A. (2019). Case study method: A step-by-step guide for business researchers. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919862424

Smith, N. J., Goodman, N. D., & Frank, M. C. (2013). Learning and using language via recursive pragmatic reasoning about other agents. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.

Tongco, M. D. C. (2007). Purposive sampling as a tool for informant selection. Ethnobotany Research and Applications. https://doi.org/10.17348/ERA.5.0.147-158

Wijngaarden, Y. (2022). “I like the ‘buzz’, but I also suffer from it.” Mitigating interaction and distraction in collective workplaces. Human Relations. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267221121277

Zhu, Y. (2024). The power of words: Exploring the role of psycholinguistics in enhancing communication, motivation, and performance in the workplace. Proceedings of the International Conference on Literature, Language, and Culture Development. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7064/61/2025.18981

Downloads

Published

2026-04-08

How to Cite

Dakhi, E. S. K. S. (2026). A Psycholinguistic Study on the Influence of Verbal Communication Dynamics of Employees at Bali Business School. Austronesian: Journal of Language Science & Literature, 5(1), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.59011/austronesian.5.1.2026.16-28

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.