Kedudukan Lembaga Pengawas dan Penguatan Sistem Merit Pasca Putusan MK 121/PUU-XXII/2024

Authors

  • Dian Alya Faculty of Law, Universitas Bengkulu, Bengkulu 38371, Indonesia
  • Azifah Syaqila Ravadina Suhendra Faculty of Law, Universitas Bengkulu, Bengkulu 38371, Indonesia
  • Febrio Dosi Pratama Faculty of Law, Universitas Bengkulu, Bengkulu 38371, Indonesia
  • Iskandar Iskandar Faculty of Law, Universitas Bengkulu, Bengkulu 38371, Indonesia
  • Madinar Madinar Faculty of Law, Universitas Bengkulu, Bengkulu 38371, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59011/vjlaws.5.1.2026.55-65

Keywords:

Merit System, KASN, MK Decision 121/PUU-XXII/2024, Civil Service, Bureaucratic Reform

Abstract

The abolition of the State Civil Service Commission through Law No. 20 of 2023 on the State Civil Service has raised serious concerns regarding the weakening of merit system oversight and the increased risk of bureaucratic politicization. The Constitutional Court addressed this issue through Decision No. 121/PUU-XXII/2024, which declared the abolition of KASN conditionally unconstitutional and mandated the reestablishment of an independent oversight body. This study aims to analyze the urgency of establishing an independent civil service oversight body and to formulate an ideal institutional design following the Court’s ruling to ensure the continued implementation of the merit system within the government bureaucracy. The study employs a normative legal. The legal materials utilized include legislation, Constitutional Court decisions, and relevant academic literature. The findings indicate that the absence of an independent external oversight body has the potential to increase violations of civil service neutrality, the buying and selling of public office, and political interference in the appointment of public positions, particularly at the local level. This study identifies two institutional design models: the Parliamentary Oversight Satellite, which situates the oversight body within the parliamentary framework, and the Independent Administrative Commission, structured as a public legal entity with institutional autonomy, financial independence, and executive authority. In conclusion, future civil service oversight bodies must not merely function in an advisory capacity but must also possess effective enforcement authority and maintain an institutional position separate from the executive branch to ensure the realization of a professional, neutral, and integrity-driven bureaucracy.

References

Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Perkembangan Dan Konsolidasi Lembaga Negara Pasca Reformasi. Jakarta: Sekretaris Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi RI, 2016.

Chariah, Anggita, S Ariski, Agus Nugroho, and Adi Suhariyanto. “The Implementation of Merit-Based System on State Civil Apparatus in Indonesia.” Jurnal Borneo Administrator 16, no. 3 (2020): 383–400. https://doi.org/10.24258/jba.v16i3.704.

Hakiki, Syarah Nur, Yunita, Nadya Fricia, Raudhatul Natasya Annur, and Yulia Hanoselina. “Peran Komisi Aparatur Sipil Negara (KASN) Dalam Penegakan Kode Etik Aparatur Sipil Negara (ASN) Di Indonesia.” Orasi: Jurnal Ilmu Politik Dan Sosial 2, no. 1 (2025): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.63217/orasi.v2i1.180.

Keban, Yeremias T. Enam Dimensi Strategis Administrasi Publik : Konsep, Teori Dan Isu. Yogyakarta: Gava Media, 2014.

Kementerian Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi. Peraturan Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi Nomor 40 Tahun 2018 tentang Pedoman Sistem Merit dalam Manajemen Aparatur Sipil Negara. Berita Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2018 Nomor 1252.

Komisi Aparatur Sipil Negara. Laporan Tahunan KASN Tahun 2024. Jakarta: Komisi Aparatur Sipil Negara, 2024.

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Putusan Nomor 121/PUU-XXII/2024 tentang Pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2023 tentang Aparatur Sipil Negara. Jakarta: Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2024.

Maysura, Neha Aswin. “The Role of Merit System in Bureaucratic Reform in Indonesia: Challenges and Solutions in the Perspective of State Administration Law.” Mendapo: Journal of Administrative Law 6, no. 1 (2025): 85–105. https://doi.org/10.22437/mendapo.v6i1.40185.

Nur’Aini, Intan, Karmila Nuralifah Kadir, Nadyya Dwi Wulandari, Aqila Fayyaza Ghafur, and Farel Ananda Rizqi. “Lembaga Independen Pengawas ASN: Langkah Maju Reformasi Atau Beban Baru Kelembagaan Negara.” Desentralisasi: Jurnal Hukum, Kebijakan Publik, Dan Pemerintahan 2, no. 4 (2025): 142–51. https://doi.org/10.62383/desentralisasi.v2i4.1268

Pujianti, Sri. “Lembaga Independen Pengawas ASN Harus Dibentuk.” MK Republik Indonesia, 2025. http://mkri.id/berita/lembaga-independen-pengawas-asn-harus-dibentuk-23932.

Putri, Artika Sari Hassan Yudha, and Arif Hidayat. “Managed Devolution as a Design for Merit-Based System Oversight in the Context of Good Governance.” Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis 6, no. 8 (2025): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v6i8.1474.

Siagian, Nicholas Martua. “Menggagas Kembali Lembaga Pengawas Independen Sistem Merit ASN Pasca Putusan MK No. 121/2024.” Hukum online.com, 2025.

Silaban, Eriko, and Tumpak Haposan Simanjuntak. Pelopor Sistem Merit Dalam Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Model Simantab Timbo Dalam Pengembangan Karier. Jakarta: Detak Pustaka, 2025.

Sinambela, Narda Margaretha. “KASN: 264 ASN Terbukti Melanggar Netralitas Di Pemilu 2024.” Antaranew.com, 2024. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/4041783/kasn-264-asn-terbukti-melanggar-netralitas-di-pemilu-2024.

Soekanto, Soerjono, and Sri Mamuji. Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2013.

Suryanto, A, and M Darto. “Penerapan Kebijakan Sistem Merit: Praktik Terbaik Di Lembaga Administrasi Negara: Implementation of Merit System Policy: Best Practice in National Institute of Public Administration.” Jurnal Borneo Administrator 16, no. 3 (2020): 401–422. https://doi.org/10.24258/jba.v16i3.744.

Thoha, Miftah. Birokrasi Dan Politik Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada, 2003.

Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2023 tentang Aparatur Sipil Negara. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2023 Nomor 133, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 6897.

Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2014 tentang Aparatur Sipil Negara. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2014 Nomor 6, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5494.

Wasisto, Aryo, and Yunidar. “Desain Lembaga Pengawas Independen ASN Pasca-Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 121/PUU-XXII/2024.” Info Singkat 17, no. 20 (2025): 1–5.

Wiryono, Singgih, and Dani Prabowo. “MK Kabulkan Gugatan Koalisi Netralitas ASN, Lembaga Pengawas Independen Harus Dibentuk.” Kompas.com, 2025. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2025/10/16/15060461/mk-kabulkan-gugatan-koalisi-netralitas-asn-lembaga-pengawas-independen-harus.

Yossihara, Anita. “Penerapan Sistem Merit Diperkuat.” Kompas.id, 2018. http://kompas.id/artikel/penerapan-merit-sistem-diperkuat.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-07

How to Cite

Kedudukan Lembaga Pengawas dan Penguatan Sistem Merit Pasca Putusan MK 121/PUU-XXII/2024. (2026). Verdict: Journal of Law Science, 5(1), 55-65. https://doi.org/10.59011/vjlaws.5.1.2026.55-65

Similar Articles

11-20 of 21

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.