SLO dan FPIC dalam Tata Kelola Pertambangan Nikel: Studi Socio-Legal atas Konflik Lahan dan Kriminalisasi Masyarakat di Kabupaten Kolaka, Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59011/vjlaws.5.1.2026.12-30Keywords:
Social License to Operate, Free, Prior and Informed Consent, Pertambangan nikel, Konflik lahan, KriminalisasiAbstract
The expansion of nickel mining in Indonesia has become a strategic foundation for the mineral downstreaming agenda and the global energy transition. However, at the local level, such expansion often generates serious social conflicts, particularly concerning land control and the criminalization of communities. This study critically analyzes how the concepts of Social License to Operate (SLO) and Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) operate or fail to materialize in the governance of nickel mining in Kolaka Regency, Southeast Sulawesi. Using a qualitative socio legal approach based on literature review and case studies, this research finds that mining legitimacy in Indonesia remains dominated by a legal license paradigm that prioritizes investment certainty and state and corporate power, while sidelining the social legitimacy of local communities. The main findings reveal a systematic pattern of dispossession of community land access through state licensing instruments, accompanied by the criminalization of residents who resist or question mining operations. In this context, SLO is reduced to a post facto conflict management instrument through CSR and PPM programs, while FPIC is neither normatively institutionalized nor practically implemented. This study argues that the failure to realize SLO and FPIC in Kolaka is not merely an issue of implementation, but rather a consequence of the legal and political structures of extractivism that position the state and corporations in asymmetrical power relations with local communities. The contribution of this study lies in strengthening socio legal analysis on legitimacy, power, and justice in the governance of nickel mining in Indonesia, with Kolaka presented as a primary case.
References
Anaya, S. J. (2013). Indigenous peoples’ participatory rights in relation to decisions about natural resource extraction. Arizona Journal of International & Comparative Law, 22(1), 7–17.
Arizona, Y., Cahyadi, E., & Humaedi, M. A. (2021). Hak masyarakat adat dan konflik sumber daya alam di Indonesia. Epistema Institute.
Arboleda, M. (2020). Planetary mine: Territories of extraction under late capitalism. Verso.
Banakar, R., & Travers, M. (2013). Theory and method in socio-legal research. Hart Publishing. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781847317766
Barelli, M. (2012). Free, prior and informed consent in the aftermath of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. International Journal of Human Rights, 16(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2011.597746
Bedner, A., & Nugroho, H. (2020). Omnibus law and the centralization of regulatory authority in Indonesia. Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde, 176(4), 475–500. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134379-bja10015
Bebbington, A., Abdulai, A.-G., Bebbington, D. H., Hinfelaar, M., & Sanborn, C. (2018). Resource extraction and infrastructure threaten forest cover and community rights. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(52), 13164–13173. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1812505115
Blomley, N. (2003). Law, property and the geography of violence. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 93(1), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8306.93109
Boutilier, R. G. (2014). Frequently asked questions about the social licence to operate. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 32(4), 263–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2014.941141
Boutilier, R. G., & Thomson, I. (2011). Modelling and measuring the social license to operate. Social License.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Cornwall, A. (2008). Unpacking ‘participation’: Models, meanings and practices. Community Development Journal, 43(3), 269–283. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsn010
Cotterrell, R. (1995). Law’s community: Legal theory in sociological perspective. Clarendon Press.
Cotterrell, R. (2017). Sociology of law: An introduction (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Davis, R., & Franks, D. M. (2014). Costs of company-community conflict in the extractive sector. Harvard Kennedy School.
Dedihasriadi, L. O., Ananda, A. I., Sugiharti, D. K., Baskhoro, A. E., & Hasgar A. S., A. M. (2026). Strengthening Indigenous Peoples’ rights: Integrating the FPIC principle into Indonesia’s mining legal framework. Cepalo, 10(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.25041/cepalo.v10no1.4899
Doyle, C. (2015). Indigenous peoples, title to territory, rights and resources: The transformative role of free prior and informed consent. Routledge.
Doyle, C., & Gilbert, J. (2018). Indigenous peoples and globalization: From “development aggression” to “self-determined development”. European Yearbook of Minority Issues, 16, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1163/22116117_01601002
Dunlap, A., & Jakobsen, J. (2020). The violent technologies of extraction: Political ecology, critical agrarian studies and the green transition. Political Geography, 81, 102–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2020.102112
Eckersley, R. (2004). The green state: Rethinking democracy and sovereignty. MIT Press.
Esteves, A. M., Franks, D., & Vanclay, F. (2017). Social impact assessment: The state of the art. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 30(1), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2012.660356
Flick, U. (2018). An introduction to qualitative research (6th ed.). Sage.
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Pantheon Books.
Galanter, M. (1974). Why the “haves” come out ahead: Speculations on the limits of legal change. Law & Society Review, 9(1), 95–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053023
Green, P., & Ward, T. (2004). State crime: Governments, violence and corruption. Pluto Press.
Gudynas, E. (2013). Extractivism and neoextractivism: Two sides of the same curse. In Beyond development (pp. 61–86).
Gunningham, N., Kagan, R. A., & Thornton, D. (2004). Social license and environmental protection: Why businesses go beyond compliance. Law & Policy, 26(3–4), 307–341. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0265-8240.2004.00191.x
Halliday, T. C., & Schmidt, P. D. (2009). Conducting law and society research. Cambridge University Press.
Ham, U. (2024). Penerapan social license to operate (SLO) dan FPIC dalam tata kelola pertambangan nikel di Kabupaten Kolaka (Tesis Magister, Universitas Gadjah Mada).
Ham, U. (2025). The implementation of the social license to operate (SLO) concept in nickel mining governance in Kolaka Regency. PCD Journal, 13(1).
Harvey, D. (2003). The new imperialism. Oxford University Press.
Hund, K., La Porta, D., Fabregas, T. P., Laing, T., & Drexhage, J. (2020). Minerals for climate action: The mineral intensity of the clean energy transition. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/34317
International Labour Organization. (1989). ILO Convention No. 169 concerning Indigenous and Tribal Peoples. ILO.
Kemp, D., & Owen, J. R. (2018). Corporate social responsibility, extractive industries and the governance of dissent. Journal of Business Ethics, 148(2), 403–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2846-9
Kirsch, S. (2014). Mining capitalism: The relationship between corporations and their critics. University of California Press.
Leftwich, A. (1995). Bringing politics back in: Towards a model of the developmental state. Journal of Development Studies, 31(3), 400–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220389508422370
Levien, M. (2013). Regimes of dispossession. Development and Change, 44(2), 381–407. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12012
McCrudden, C. (2006). Legal research and the social sciences. Law Quarterly Review, 122, 632–650.
Merry, S. E. (2006). Human rights and gender violence: Translating international law into local justice. University of Chicago Press.
Owen, J. R., & Kemp, D. (2013). Social licence and mining: A critical perspective. Resources Policy, 38(1), 29–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2012.06.016
Papillon, M., & Rodon, T. (2020). The transformative potential of Indigenous-driven approaches to implementing free, prior and informed consent: Lessons from two Canadian cases. International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, 27(2), 314–335. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718115-02702009
Peluso, N. L., & Lund, C. (2011). New frontiers of land control. Journal of Peasant Studies, 38(4), 667–681. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2011.607692
Power, M. (1997). The audit society: Rituals of verification. Oxford University Press.
Praja, S. J., Wulandari, S., Simanjuntak, T. H., Sudrajat, I., & Lambelanova, R. (2025). Bordered by nickel: Multi-impact of mining governance on the Konawe–North Konawe boundary, Indonesia. Society, 13(2), 964–984. https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v13i2.942
Prno, J., & Slocombe, D. S. (2012). Exploring the origins of “social license to operate” in the mining sector: Perspectives from governance and sustainability theories. Resources Policy, 37(3), 346–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2012.04.002
Rajak, D. (2011). In good company: An anatomy of corporate social responsibility. Stanford University Press.
Rodríguez-Garavito, C. (2011). Ethnicity.gov: Global governance, indigenous peoples, and the right to prior consultation in social minefields. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 18(1), 263–305. https://doi.org/10.2979/indjglolegstu.18.1.263
Shore, C., & Wright, S. (2015). Governing by numbers: Audit culture, rankings and the new world order. Social Anthropology, 23(1), 22–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.12098
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Sovacool, B. K., et al. (2020). Sustainable minerals and metals for a low-carbon future. Science, 367(6473), 30–33. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz6003
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage.
Szablowski, D. (2010). Operationalizing free, prior, and informed consent in the extractive industry sector? Canadian Journal of Development Studies, 30(1–2), 111–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/02255189.2010.9669289
Tamanaha, B. Z. (2008). Understanding legal pluralism: Past to present, local to global. Sydney Law Review, 30, 375–411.
Temper, L., & Del Bene, D. (2016). Transforming knowledge creation for environmental and epistemic justice. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 20, 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2016.05.008
Thomson, I., & Boutilier, R. G. (2011). Social license to operate. In P. Darling (Ed.), SME mining engineering handbook(3rd ed.). Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration.
United Nations. (2007). United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. United Nations.
van der Ploeg, L., & Vanclay, F. (2017). A human rights based approach to social impact assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 35(1), 34–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2016.1271535
Welker, M. (2014). Enacting the corporation: An American mining firm in post-authoritarian Indonesia. University of California Press.
Warburton, E. (2017). Resource nationalism in Indonesia. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 47(2), 285–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2016.1239279
Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society. University of California Press.
Whyte, D. (2014). How corrupt is Britain? A critical review of state–corporate crime. State Crime Journal, 3(1), 64–87. https://doi.org/10.13169/statecrime.3.1.0064
World Bank. (2020). Minerals for climate action: The mineral intensity of the clean energy transition. World Bank.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Umirul Ham
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
