The Language of Vegan Beauty: Lexical Choices in Rare Beauty’s Advertisements
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59011/austronesian.5.3.2026.1011-1021Keywords:
Ecolinguistics, Lexical Choices, AdvertisementsAbstract
Beauty advertising increasingly associates products with natural ingredients, presenting nature as an essential source of beauty and personal care. However, such representations may primarily serve promotional purposes rather than communicate genuine environmental responsibility. This study explores the representation of nature through lexical choices in Rare Beauty cosmetic advertisements, focusing on how advertising language constructs associations between natural ingredients, beauty, and personal well-being. Employing a descriptive qualitative approach, the study analyzes ten selected excerpts from Rare Beauty product descriptions. The data were examined using Stibbe's ecolinguistic framework, particularly the concepts of evaluation, framing, salience, identity, and erasure. The findings reveal that lexical expressions such as botanical, antioxidant-rich, and nourishing construct nature as a source of nourishment and emotional comfort. Evaluation is realized through positively connotated expressions that present nature-derived ingredients as beneficial and desirable. Framing positions skincare and haircare as forms of holistic self-care, while salience foregrounds botanical ingredients, sensory experiences, and natural imagery. Furthermore, the advertisements implicitly construct consumer identities associated with natural beauty, wellness, and self-care. However, the analysis also identifies erasure through the limited representation of environmental concerns, particularly ingredient sourcing, production processes, and sustainability practices. The study concludes that Rare Beauty's advertising discourse uses ecological imagery not only to describe product ingredients and benefits but also as a persuasive linguistic resource that connects beauty consumption with naturalness and wellness. Nevertheless, the positive representation of nature does not necessarily indicate actual environmental responsibility, revealing a distinction between ecological representation and concrete sustainability commitments.
References
Alexander, R. J. (2009). Framing discourse on the environment: A critical discourse approach. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203890615
Alexander, R. J., & Stibbe, A. (2014). From the analysis of ecological discourse to the ecological analysis of discourse. Language Sciences, 41, 104–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2013.08.011
Cook, G. (2001). The discourse of advertising (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203978153
Delmas, M. A., & Burbano, V. C. (2011). The drivers of greenwashing. California Management Review, 54(1), 64–87. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2011.54.1.64
Fairclough, N. (1995). Media discourse. Edward Arnold.
Fill, A. F., & Penz, H. (Eds.). (2018). The Routledge handbook of ecolinguistics. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315687391
Hartono, D. A., Prima, S. A. B., & Dewobroto, W. S. (2022). A multimodal critical discourse analysis of Garnier Green Beauty advertisement. International Journal of English and Applied Linguistics, 2(2), 301–312. https://doi.org/10.47709/ijeal.v2i2.1654
Kenalemang-Palm, L. M., & Eriksson, G. (2023). The scientifization of “green” anti-ageing cosmetics in online marketing: A multimodal critical discourse analysis. Social Semiotics, 33(5), 1026–1045. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2021.1981128
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Krishna, A. (2012). An integrative review of sensory marketing: Engaging the senses to affect perception, judgment and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(3), 332–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2011.08.003
Limbu, Y. B., & Ahamed, A. F. M. J. (2023). What influences green cosmetics purchase intention and behavior? A systematic review and future research agenda. Sustainability, 15(15), Article 11881. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151511881
Liu, S., & Liu, X. (2020). Culture and green advertising preference: A comparative and critical discursive analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 1944. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01944
Lyon, T. P., & Montgomery, A. W. (2015). The means and end of greenwash. Organization & Environment, 28(2), 223–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026615575332
Mansoor, M., Saeed, A., Kartawinata, B. R., & Khan, M. K. N. (2022). Derivers of green buying behavior for organic skincare products through an interplay of green brand evaluation and green advertisement. Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, 13(4), 328–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/20932685.2022.2085597
Martins, A. M., & Marto, J. M. (2023). A sustainable life cycle for cosmetics: From design and development to post-use phase. Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy, 35, Article 101178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scp.2023.101178
Montgomery, A. W., Lyon, T. P., & Barg, J. (2024). No end in sight? A greenwash review and research agenda. Organization & Environment, 37(2), 221–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/10860266231168905
Morel, S., Mura, G., Gallarate, M., & Sapino, S. (2024). Cosmetic packaging: European regulatory aspects and sustainability. Cosmetics, 11(4), Article 110. https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics11040110
Shen, F., Yang, G., Conlin, J., & Wang, X. (2024). Effects of green messages in advertisements: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Advertising, 43(1), 36–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2023.2252675
Simão, S. A. V., Rohden, S. F., & Pinto, D. C. (2022). Natural claims and sustainability: The role of perceived efficacy and sensorial expectations. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 34, 505–517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.09.026
Stibbe, A. (2021). Ecolinguistics: Language, ecology and the stories we live by (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Stibbe, A. (2024). Taste the feeling: An ecolinguistic analysis of Coca-Cola advertising. Journal of World Languages, 10(2), 280–303. https://doi.org/10.1515/jwl-2023-0027
Stöckl, H., & Molnar, S. (2018). Eco-advertising: The linguistics and semiotics of green(-washed) persuasion. In A. F. Fill & H. Penz (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of ecolinguistics (pp. 261–276). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315687391-18
Teixeira, S., Oliveira, Z., Teixeira, S., & Teixeira, S. (2023). Understanding the impact of online communication strategies on consumer purchase intention for green cosmetics. Sustainability, 15(20), Article 14784. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152014784
Testa, R., Rizzo, G., Schifani, G., Tóth, J., & Migliore, G. (2024). Critical determinants influencing consumers’ decision-making process to buy green cosmetics: A systematic literature review. Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, 15(3), 357–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/20932685.2023.2268669
Virdis, D. F. (2022). Ecological stylistics: Ecostylistic approaches to discourses of nature, the environment and sustainability. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10658-3
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Radha Andhra Swari, Made Sani Damayanthi Muliawan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.











