Punishment for Cybercrime: A Major Challenge in Modern Legal Systems

Authors

  • Ridho Duha Faculty of Law, Nias Raya University, South Nias 22865, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59011/vjlaws.3.2.2024.86-93

Keywords:

Cybercrime, Punishment, Global security, Electronic transactions

Abstract

Cybercrime represents a major challenge to modern legal systems due to its transnational nature and its continual evolution alongside digital technological advancements. The increasing intensity and complexity of cybercrime drives the need for an adaptive legal system that is able to provide effective legal protection. This study aims to analyze the application of penalties for cybercrime in Indonesia, assess its effectiveness, and compare it with legal practices at the international level. The approach used is normative juridical with qualitative analysis techniques on primary and secondary legal materials, including case studies of cybercrime in Indonesia, Singapore, and Estonia. The results of the study show that although Indonesia has a legal basis in the form of Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions (ITE) and the Criminal Code, its implementation has not been optimal due to the weak technical capacity of the apparatus, minimal coordination across institutions, and the absence of a strong international cooperation mechanism. Comparative studies indicate that countries such as Singapore and Estonia have built a more proactive legal framework through a multi-level and integrative approach. The conclusion of this study emphasizes the importance of regulatory revision, increasing digital forensic capacity, and ongoing international cooperation. Practical implications of this study include the need to strengthen the law enforcement system, develop a national digital literacy policy, and greater involvement of the private sector in combating cybercrime.

References

Anwary, Ichsan. “Evaluating Legal Frameworks for Cybercrime in Indonesian Public Administration: An Interdisciplinary Approach.” International Journal of Cyber Criminology 17, no. 1 (2023): 12–22. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4766601.

Ariyaningsih, Sindy, A. Ari Andrianto, Adri Surya Kusuma, and Rina Arum Prastyanti. “Korelasi Kejahatan Siber Dengan Percepatan Digitalisasi Di Indonesia.” Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 1, no. 1 (2023): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.56457/jjih.v1i1.38.

Arora, Bhavna. “Exploring and Analyzing Internet Crimes and Their Behaviours.” Perspectives in Science 8 (2016): 540–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pisc.2016.06.014.

Dakalbab, Fatima, Manar Abu Talib, Omnia Abu Waraga, Ali Bou Nassif, Sohail Abbas, and Qassim Nasir. “Artificial Intelligence & Crime Prediction: A Systematic Literature Review.” Social Sciences and Humanities Open 6, no. 1 (2022): 100342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2022.100342.

Holt, Thomas J. “Understanding the State of Criminological Scholarship on Cybercrimes.” Computers in Human Behavior 139 (2023): 107493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107493.

ITU. Global Cybersecurity Index 2020. Geneva: International Telecommunication Union (ITU), 2021.

Khan, Azfer A. “Reconceptualizing Policing for Cybercrime: Perspectives from Singapore.” Laws 13, no. 4 (2024): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws13040044.

Lee, So-Hyun, Ilwoong Kang, and Hee-Woong Kim. “Understanding Cybercrime from a Criminal’s Perspective: Why and How Suspects Commit Cybercrimes?” Technology in Society 75 (2023): 102361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102361.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Cet. XIV. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group, 2019.

NAO. Investigation: WannaCry Cyber Attack and the NHS. London, England: National Audit Office, 2017.

Porcedda, Maria Grazia. “Sentencing Data-Driven Cybercrime. How Data Crime with Cascading Effects Is Tackled by UK Courts.” Computer Law and Security Review 48 (2023): 105793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105793.

Ramadhan, Iqbal. “ASEAN Consensus and Forming Cybersecurity Regulation in Southeast Asia,” 2022. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.31-3-2022.2320684.

Republic of Singapore. “Cybersecurity Act,” 2018.

Suseno, Sigid, Ahmad M. Ramli, Ranti Fauza Mayana, Tasya Safiranita, and Bernadette Aurellia Nathania Tiarma. “Cybercrime in the New Criminal Code in Indonesia.” Cogent Social Sciences 11, no. 1 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2439543.

Syahranuddin, S, and Suci Ramadani. “Criminal Law Policies in Overcoming Cyber Crime in Indonesia.” Proceedings of The International Conference on Multi-Disciplines Approaches for The Sustainable Development, 2023, 738–42.

Tok, Yee Ching, and Sudipta Chattopadhyay. “Identifying Threats, Cybercrime and Digital Forensic Opportunities in Smart City Infrastructure via Threat Modeling.” Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation 45 (2023): 301540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsidi.2023.301540.

UNODC. Cybercrime: A Global Perspective. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, 2021.

Vitus, Emmanuel Nnaemeka. “Cybercrime and Online Safety: Addressing the Challenges and Solutions Related to Cybercrime, Online Fraud, and Ensuring a Safe Digital Environment for All Users— A Case of African States.” TIJER - International Research Journal 10, no. 9 (2023): 975–89.

Wall, David S. Cybercrime: The Transformation of Crime in the Information Age. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2007.

Yar, M, and K. F Steinmetz. Cybercrime and Society. 4th ed. New York: SAGE Publications Ltd, 2023.

Downloads

Published

2024-08-02

How to Cite

Duha, R. (2024). Punishment for Cybercrime: A Major Challenge in Modern Legal Systems. Verdict: Journal of Law Science, 3(2), 86–93. https://doi.org/10.59011/vjlaws.3.2.2024.86-93